Make Your Notes Actionable with This Simple System

A weekly cadence that converts ideas into outcomes.

I used to have a graveyard of “good ideas.” Half-formed notes in half a dozen apps. Photos of whiteboards I never revisited. Beautiful highlights with exactly zero outcomes attached.

Then I did something embarrassingly simple: I moved my thinking back to paper—fast, messy, human—and built a repeatable pipeline into Craft that forces those scribbles to become real work. It’s boring in the best way. And it works.

This piece is the complete playbook—explaining why the analog-first start matters, how to structure ‘Craft’ to turn notes into deliverables, and the exact moves to take to spark a project to “shipped.”

I’ll back each step with research and show concrete use cases so you can steal what’s useful and ignore the rest.

(If you want the templates and my review cadence, that’s in the paywalled section below.)

---

Paper first, on purpose

I start every project with a pen and a legal pad. No tabs. No notifications. Just the problem, the constraints, and a few ugly drawings.

Why it works:

• Handwritten notes prompt you to process ideas rather than just transcribing them.

• In controlled studies, students taking notes by hand performed better on conceptual questions than laptop notetakers, because handwriting nudges you to summarize and reframe—aka real thinking.

Use case: Planning a new Substack series
I scribble a 1-pager: working title, audience promise, “what this is not,” and three story angles. That single sheet becomes the spine for everything that follows. No app-switching, no formatting rabbit holes—just thinking.

From there, I move to Craft.

The workflow: Paper → Craft “Project Home” → Linked notes → Tasks → Calendar review → Ship. The sequencing matters.

For the “why Craft?” crowd: this workflow was inspired by a video walkthrough that shows brainstorming on paper, then expanding and organizing in Craft for editing and execution. It’s not flashy.

It’s clean, and it scales.

Build a “Project Home” in Craft (that actually drives outcomes)

In Craft, every project gets a Project Home page. Think of it as your command center:

• Top section: Project promise (one sentence), “Definition of Done,” deadline.

• Middle: Links to research notes, assets, and decisions.

• Bottom: Task block with the following three visible actions.

Why it works: Craft’s links and backlinks automatically show where this page is referenced, creating a living map of your project. You can @-link pages/blocks, and Craft adds backlinks at the bottom so you see related thinking without manual upkeep. (Craft Help, Craft Docs)

Use case: Client pitch you must deliver in 10 days
Create “Pitch – Acme Q4 Growth,” add the promise and deadline, then link out to: “Competitor snapshots,” “Feature differentiators,” “Case studies,” and “Objections.”

As you @-link those from anywhere, backlinks surface on the pitch’s Project Home so you don’t lose the thread.

Organize with PARA so you always know what’s “live”

Most people don’t ship because their notes are sorted by topic, not by commitment. PARA fixes that.

• Projects (active, with deadlines)

• Areas (ongoing responsibilities)

• Resources (reference you might use)

• Archives (done or parked)

PARA is intentionally platform-agnostic and straightforward; it’s a decade-tested method for funneling attention to what’s actionable now. (Forte Labs, buildingasecondbrain.com)

Use case: You research “note-taking apps” (Resource), but the Project is “Publish ‘Paper to Productive’ on Substack by Oct 5.” The Resource supports the Project; it doesn’t compete with it. That one decision prevents 90% of “where do I put this?” thrash.

Turn notes into motion with GTD’s five verbs

PARA is your map; GTD gives you the verbs that move the work:

1. Capture everything (paper + Craft inbox)

2. Clarify what each thing is (is it actionable? what’s the next step?)

3. Organize (file into Project/Area/Resource)

4. Reflect (review cadence)

5. Engage (do the next visible action)

That’s the whole flow. No mysticism, just decisions. (Getting Things Done®, Thomas Frank)

Use case: After a client discovery call, you paste raw notes into Craft, then immediately Clarify: “Send recap + timeline draft” (task), “Ask for analytics access” (task), “Parking lot: potential Phase 2.” The tasks live on the Project Home; the parking lot sits lower on the page. You’ve converted noise to a short list you’ll actually do.

Externalize to think better (and forget safely)

Many “memory hacks” are actually forms of talented procrastination.

The real unlock is cognitive offloading: using external structures (paper layouts, checklists, documents, links) to reduce mental load so your brain can focus on reasoning, not retention.

Research calls this the use of the body and world to simplify cognition—legit, not lazy.

Craft gives you clean “external places” to drop thinking:

• Daily Notes to park ideas, jot down decisions, and see today’s scheduled tasks. (Craft Docs)

• Tasks with due dates, repeaters, and a workspace list to review across docs. (Craft Help)

• Deeplinks to jump to a precise block—great for connecting a line in your research to a slide in your deck. (Craft Help)

Use case: You’re editing a YouTube script and remember a stat from an old article. Instead of hunting, you paste a deeplink to the exact paragraph in your “Stats – Creator Economy” note. Next time, you click once and land on the answer.

Make ideas stick with spaced review (without becoming a librarian)

You don’t need a flashcard empire. You need a rhythm.

The science is overwhelming: spaced practice beats massed practice for long-term retention, across hundreds of experiments. Even a simple “review this later at increasing intervals” makes knowledge usable when you need it. (PubMed, Learning Attention and Perception Lab)

In practice:

• Tag any note worth revisiting with “🔁 Review.”

• Add a tiny line at the top: “Review on: Oct 10 → Nov 1 → Dec 1.”

• During your weekly review, bump the date forward if it’s still relevant.

Use case: You’re building a multi-part Substack series. Each research note has three future review dates. When the day arrives, Craft surfaces the task; you skim, harvest what’s useful for the current piece, and push the next date. You stay warm on the topic without re-reading the internet.

Collaborate without chaos

Sharing is where many systems fall apart. Craft keeps it sane:

• Share for view or edit with strict control over who can see and change what.

• Export to send drafts as Markdown, PDF, or other formats when collaborators live in Google Docs or Word. (Craft Help)

Use case: You co-write a client case study. Keep the master in Craft (so your links/backlinks stay intact), export Markdown for their CMS, and archive the final in Projects → Archives. The web piece is shipped; the knowledge stays in your system.

The end-to-end pipeline (the part most people skip)

Here’s the exact path I use from zero to shipped:

1. Paper – one messy page (problem, constraints, promise, 3 angles).

2. Craft Project Home – state Definition of Done and deadline; create Tasks (first 3). (Craft Help)

3. Linked Notes – research, quotes, outlines; use @-links so backlinks accrue automatically. (Craft Help)

4. Draft in Craft – rough to readable.

5. Review cadence – daily sweep (5–7 minutes) + weekly PARA pass (15–20 minutes). (Forte Labs)

6. Export/Publish – share for feedback, export if needed, then publish. (Craft Help)

7. Archive – move Project to Archives; convert any still-useful notes to Resources.

Use case: Turning a talk into a Substack article + YouTube script

• Paper: draw the 3-act arc and 1 core takeaway.

• Craft: “Talk → Article/Social” Project Home with a checklist (Intro story, Evidence, Use cases, CTA).

• Research note: link studies (handwriting benefits; offloading; spacing) and assets. (SAGE Journals, PubMed)

• Draft, export for a collaborator’s review, publish, archive.

Metrics that matter (so you know it’s working)

I track three leading indicators:

• Idea-to-Draft Cycle Time (days from first paper page to first draft in Craft)

• Draft-to-Published Cycle Time (days from first draft to ship)

• Touch Count per Project (how many sessions before it ships—lower is better)

The “measurement = behavior” effect is real; you will unconsciously optimize what you count. Keep the numbers visible on your Project Home (three lines, no dashboards).

Use case: If Draft-to-Published stretches beyond 10 days, I audit the Project Home: Is the Definition of Done clear enough? Are the following three tasks visible? Is my review cadence slipping? Most delays die there.

---

Standard failure modes (and quick fixes)

• Too many Projects: If it won’t ship within 30 days, it’s not a Project. It’s an Area or a Resource. (PARA keeps you honest.) (Forte Labs)

• Notes that don’t connect: If a note isn’t @-linked from a Project, it’s likely dead weight. Add one link or delete it. (Craft Help)

• Over-curation: Spaced review doesn’t mean “groom for hours.” Add a future date, skim through that day, harvest one valuable thing, and then move on. (PubMed)

What changes when you work this way

• You think better on paper, faster. (Depth > speed, proven.)

• Your digital space matches your commitments, not your curiosities. (PARA.)

• Your notes become a network, not a pile. (Links/backlinks.)

• You forget less and decide quickly. (Cognitive offloading.)

• You retain more with less effort. (Spacing.)

And yes, you ship more.

---

[PAYWALL] Templates, cadence, and my exact Craft setup

You can copy and paste this template into any notetaking app, such as Craft, Evernote, Notion, or even MS Excel/Word.